{"id":503,"date":"2023-03-17T13:15:29","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T11:15:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/?p=503"},"modified":"2023-03-17T13:20:28","modified_gmt":"2023-03-17T11:20:28","slug":"ocular-dominance-hole-in-card-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/ocular-dominance-hole-in-card-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Ocular Dominance \/ Hole-in-card procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-ad2f72ca wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<p>After an innocent question of a student on how to measure occular dominance, I was let down a rabbit hole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a more recent paper I found it referenced as the &#8220;Dolman Method&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/iovs.arvojournals.org\/article.aspx?articleid=2127589\">Li et al 2010<\/a>. A good starting point! Indeed, it pointed to <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/article-abstract\/212063\">Durand and Gould (1910)<\/a> which developed an aparatus to measure occular dominance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But this is clearly not a Hole-in-card test, also neither of those are called &#8220;Dolman&#8221;. Let&#8217;s dig deeper!<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image is-style-default\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/upload\/sites\/2\/2023\/03\/grafik.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/upload\/sites\/2\/2023\/03\/grafik.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-504\" width=\"379\" height=\"375\"\/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Durand and Gould 2010<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-content-justification-left is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-f56a869c wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-8cf370e7 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p>Google didn&#8217;t really help, gpt4 offered me fake citations and blamed me that I can&#8217;t find them \u2014 but google-scholar offered me <a href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/1919-10014-017\">Miles 1929<\/a>. It is a nice read, citing some Da Vinci (via Gould s.a.), referencing Donders all in the context of binocular vision and ocular dominance. Funnily, he&#8217;s mentioning that Helmholtz didn&#8217;t reference this problem at all. And finally, it contains the original source of the Dolman Method, by <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/americanjournalo3219unse\/page\/866\/mode\/2up\">Captain Perc. Dolman 1919<\/a> (&#8220;Tests for determining the sighting eye&#8221;, page 867, American Journal of Ophthalmology volume 2). I pasted the single-page paper below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And there we have it \u2014 the de facto standard for measuring optical dominance. Interestingly, Dolman is rarely cited. So next time, you know better!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\"><strong>Author<\/strong><\/th><th class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Citations<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">Durand &amp; Gould 1910<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">81<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">Miles 1929<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">251<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-right\" data-align=\"right\">Dolman 1919<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\">29<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Dolman is rarely cited, the hole-in-card test is typically attributed to Miles or Durand\/Gould, even though both their methods used &#8220;scopes&#8221;<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"http:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/upload\/sites\/2\/2023\/03\/grafik-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/upload\/sites\/2\/2023\/03\/grafik-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-506\" width=\"251\" height=\"335\"\/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Dolman 1919 &#8211; first description of the actual hole-in-card test.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p><br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After an innocent question of a student on how to measure occular dominance, I was let down a rabbit hole. In a more recent paper I found it referenced as the &#8220;Dolman Method&#8221; Li et al 2010. A good starting point! Indeed, it pointed to Durand and Gould (1910) which developed an aparatus to measure occular dominance. But this is clearly not a Hole-in-card test, also neither of those are called &#8220;Dolman&#8221;. Let&#8217;s dig deeper! Google didn&#8217;t really help, gpt4 offered me fake citations and blamed me that I can&#8217;t find them \u2014 but google-scholar offered me Miles 1929. It&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benediktehinger.de\/blog\/science\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}